Why Assad Is Still Able to Kill With GasApril 16, 2018 1:57pm

If your takeaway from the reports on Friday's air strikes on Syria's chemical weapons facilities by US, French, and British forces was that President Bashar al-Assad's ability to conduct future chemical strikes had been eliminated, you'd be wrong.

In an analysis titled, "A Hard Lesson in Syria: Assad Can Still Gas His Own People," the New York Times outlines four reasons why this is so, and the Wall Street Journal adds a fifth:

  1. Though the Pentagon characterized the strike's three targets as "fundamental components of the regime's chemical weapons warfare infrastructure," it's possible that is only true in a historical sense.

In the wake of the strikes, there have been no reports of casualties at the targeted facilities—the Barzeh research and development center, the Him Shinshar storage facility, and a bunker—nor any reports of gas leakage, suggesting the sites could have been abandoned or only in light use.

  1. The Times takes a historical view, to 2014, when Syria agreed to hand over its "declared" stockpiles of chemical weapons.

Then-Secretary of State John Kerry said "we got 100% of the chemical weapons out," and some 600 metric tons of chemical agents were destroyed by the US.

The takeaway: "Mr. Assad has learned a lot about how to hide his stockpiles from inspectors."

  • And not everything is in hiding: The Journal cites a UN report from early 2018 that names at least two suspected chemical weapons facilities that weren't taken out on Saturday.

The Pentagon reportedly limited the strikes to targets where civilians wouldn't be affected.

  • Even if the destroyed facilities were key, it's not that hard to rebuild them elsewhere, at least when it comes to making chlorine or sarin, which can be produced in basic facilities.
  • And in terms of chlorine, it's a big challenge.

It's essential in the Middle East for water purification, making it both legal and lethal. Though chemical weapons treaties ban the use of chlorine as a poison, they do not make it illegal to possess.

How Michael Knights, a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, puts it: "For me, the big story is chlorine; it’s not sarin. ... You either have to deter the regime from using it by imposing significant costs, or you have to get rid of the regime. But there is no way you can get rid of the capability." Head to the Times for the full analysis.

More From Newser

This article originally appeared on Newser: Why Assad Is Still Able to Kill With Gas

Page 1 of 1

More Stories Like This

Marc Thiessen: Trump isn't the first president to embarrass America by cozying up to PutinThe definition of insanity is doing the same thing again and again and expecting to get a different result, which is one of the many reasons President Trump's news conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin seemed so insane.
A Syrian policeman stand guard at a check point on the entrance of the central Syrian town of Rastan, Homs province, Syria, Tuesday, July 17, 2018. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)
Syrian forces' bombing intensifies in southern rebel holdout
Russia offers to help refugees return, resettle in SyriaRussia's Defense Ministry has offered to help organize the return of Syrian refugees who fled during their country's civil war and want to go home
In this Tuesday, July 17, 2018, photo, Syrian policemen check IDs at a checkpoint in the town of Rastan, Syria. Rastan and nearby Talbiseh were among the first Syrian towns to carry weapons against the government when the uprising against President Bashar Assad began in 2011. As the Syrian government reasserts control over opposition strongholds, co-existence between the military and former rebel fighters who surrendered is the new reality. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)
Under Assad's grip, uneasy co-existence with former rebels
In this July 16, 2018, photo, U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, shake hands at the beginning of a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland. Trump and Putin may have reached several historic agreements at their summit in Finland this week. Or, they may not have. Three days later no one is quite sure. With no details emerging from the leaders’ one-on-one discussion on Monday other than the vague outline they offered themselves, officials, lawmakers and the public in the United States in particular are wondering what, if anything, was actually agreed to. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Did Trump and Putin agree to anything? Only they know
Trump’s Helsinki Disgrace
AdChoices

Related Searches

Related Searches

AdChoices